As mentioned here, I’ve been working with a spreadsheet containing addresses that want to be geocoded. I’ve had lots of experience running batches of addresses through geocoding services, but in the case of the police department I’ve been working with, it would be nice to be able to do the geocoding interactively. That way, [...]

Guillaume Cartier gave a demo of JazzScheme at the August meeting of lispvan . The presentation focused on both JazzScheme (a lisp language based on Scheme but influenced by other languages) and Jedi (a programming IDE developed in JazzScheme).

JazzScheme Jedi

JazzScheme "feels" familiar to both CL programmers and Scheme programmers (although it is neither) as it incorporates features from multiple languages. In addition, it currently supports a mixture of object systems. For people coming from a Java background, there is an object system that looks very similar to the Java one; however, JazzScheme also supports a more CLOS-like object system as well and a programmer can mix-and-match the approaches.

Although JazzScheme is currently a Win32-only product, it was recently open-sourced and Guillaume is porting it to Linux and Mac OS X by re-writing the Win32-specific C++ core in Scheme (currently, Gambit ) and using the Cairo graphics library (for graphical rendering). In addition, he is transitioning JazzScheme from a proprietary lisp dialect to actually being an R5RS-compliant Scheme.

Jedi is the IDE used to develop JazzScheme code (although it also currently supports Scheme, CL, C++, and Java as well) and is the largest non-commercial application developed in JazzScheme. It has a look and feel similar to Eclipse but with influences from Emacs, MCL, and the Lisp Machine. It was fun to see how you could dynamically introspect/debug/change UI components of the editor while you were editing code in the editor! Once the multi-platform port has been completed, Jedi should provide a nice alternative for Scheme or CL programmers who don't want to use Emacs.

Guillaume plans to have the cross-platform version of JazzScheme/Jedi available (as an early beta) in the beginning of 2008. It will be interesting to see how this develops and I'll definitely be following his progress. If you're interested in learning more about JazzScheme, you can browse the JazzScheme web site, download the Win32 version of the code, and join the

Joe O’Brien and I will be hosting the Test-Driven Developement in Rails Pragmatic Studio in Columbus.

Test Driven Developement in Rails

Mark your calendars. It is official! Joe O’Brien and I will be teaching a new Pragmatic Studio: Test Driven Development in Rails . The first offering of this studio will be in Columbus on October 17th through the 19th.

To quote from the web site :

In this Studio, you’ll learn how to do test-driven development by actually doing it. We’ll teach you how to get started with a solid foundation of testing practices, and then quickly build on those with advanced techniques and tools. You’ll experience a powerful synergy between testing and design that helps you write better software, faster!

If you ever wanted to improve your testing skills in Ruby and Rails, then this wil be the place for you. I’m really excited about this opportunity. I hope to see a lot of you there.

Y Combinator held its Demo Day in Boston unveiling 19 new startups to VCs and investors. The companies covered areas like; video streaming; concert recommendations; enterprise wikis; a music player; an ad network; music games; hosted forums; price search; file synchronization; web promotions; an image editor; music rating; a stock-picking...

Nick Carr picks up on an article called The cold, cold heart of Web 2.0 by William Davies in which Davies builds upon the economic theory of Gary Becker: “Along with many colleagues at the legendary Chicago School of Economics, Becker’s achievement was to see that economics needn’t confine itself to studying markets. Economics, for Becker, [...]

2007-08-10 02:33:11 GMT

Fun game: try to post a YouTube comment so stupid that people realize you must be joking.  (Hint: this is impossible)

Windows Live SkyDrive (formerly Windows Live Folders) announced a new beta release with several new features. The beta is currently open to users in the USA, UK, and India. Windows Live SkyDrive provides 500MB of online storage. You can save files in private or public folders. The public folders can...

Those of you who read this blog to follow tech and startup topics may be getting dismayed that I keep talking about this hedge fund stuff. But I think an in-depth understanding of financial markets is highly helpful for a...

So you're having a problem with your computer, eh? Yes, you're right, I do know something about computers and yes, I was a computer science major. Will I fix your problem? I'll certainly try. I'm more than happy to help...

Reuters: Recordings that claim to stimulate baby brain development may actually slow vocabulary development in infants if they are overused, U.S. researchers reported on Wednesday. For every hour per day spent watching baby DVDs and videos, infants aged 8 to...

New York Times: Striding to the middle of the room, Alan D. Schwartz, 57, who had been named sole president [of Bear Stearns] on Sunday, did not mince words. “These are the types of markets in which Bear Stearns excels,”...

Ok, so Lisp in Small Pieces might only be #1 on because of the sudden burst of buying caused by Zach's post about the CDN$3.95 price; however, it's nice to see a Lisp title hit the #1 spot. Queinnec's book has been on my bookshelf for years and is listed in my list of Lisp Books as the "Best book on implementing Lisps", so it is really a steal at CDN$3.95.

Here's what Amazon's best sellers page looked like today. LiSP even managed to beat out Harry Potter!

LiSP on Amazon

Or, alternatively, maybe the tastes of the book-buying public are improving! ;-)

Wall Street Journal: Global Alpha, Goldman [Sachs]'s widely known internal hedge fund, is now down about 16% for the year after a choppy July, when its performance fell about 8%, according to people briefed on the matter. The fund, based...

SICP may well be the best computer science book ever written, nevertheless Eugene Wallingford believes that it is not suitable as a first course in the subject. He referenced an article in his recent blog post that details some major criticisms of the book: “SICP doesn’t state how to program and how to [...]

While I’m hurriedly working on building out a corporate site for Bokardo Design, I thought I would take a minute and share a little background which led me to starting the company and what services I’m offering. Many of you know that I worked at User Interface Engineering for 5 years. It was definitely the [...]

Wi-Fi plays on the fears that installing wiring will cause pain and cost.

Wall Street Journal today: Movie-rental chain Blockbuster Inc. [acquired] Movielink LLC, a downloading service owned by the major Hollywood studios. After several months of talks, first reported in March, Blockbuster said late yesterday it had acquired Movielink from the studios...

2007-08-09 03:21:18 GMT

Summary: Blah. Adam Smith from Xobni, a Y Combinator company, calculates that angels made 5 times as many intros as VC investors while Xobni was raising a Series A: “We spoke with 16 angels and 12 VCs. Angels made 24 introductions; VCs only made four. The average angel introduced us to 1.5 other investors, but the average [...]

Wall Street Journal headline: Bush sought to reassure jittery stock investors....

2007-08-09 00:03:18 GMT

New York Times headline: Investigators Find Possible Flaw in Minneapolis Bridge...

A short time back, several smart bloggers engaged in an enthusiastic debate about age and entrepreneurs -- some taking the position that kids have a leg up on older entrepreneurs at least for certain categories of startups, and others theorizing...

Cough... Between the Lines: News Corp. said its Fox Interactive unit, which largely consists of MySpace, turned a profit of $10 million on revenue of $550 million for the fiscal year ending June 30... News Corp. chief financial officer David...

Media Daily News covering a new Nielsen consumer television viewer study: Of the nearly 1,000 consumers Nielsen has interviewed to date, only a third could recall any TV commercials they had seen, Nielsen said in an update sent to clients...

I took half an hour to fiddle with this one.  It sounded promising: use the text editor of your choice to compose text for any type-in box you might find on the web.  (I can’t learn Emacs easily if I keep having to switch back and forth between different text editors all the time.) The “It’s [...]

Udi discusses the need for Services as a top-level concept for bridging the business/IT divide as opposed to a more message-centric view of the world. We also get into how ESBs might be developed further in a vendor-neutral way.

Can older people be great entrepreneurs?

Marc Andreesen has a great post on this age-old question. In part I, he's digging through the data. Some of his observations are powerful and worth summarizing:

"Generally, productivity -- output -- rises rapidly from the start of a career to a peak and then declines gradually until retirement.

This peak in productivity varies by field, from the late 20s to the early 50s, for reasons that are field-specific.

Precocity, longevity, and output rate are linked. "Those who are precocious also tend to display longevity, and both precocity and longevity are positively associated with high output rates per age unit." High producers produce highly, systematically, over time.

The odds of a hit versus a miss do not increase over time. The periods of one's career with the most hits will also have the most misses. So maximizing quantity -- taking more swings at the bat -- is much higher payoff than trying to improve one's batting average.

Intelligence, at least as measured by metrics such as IQ, is largely irrelevant."

I went through an evolution of sorts on this topic.

I started with a variation of the Beard Hypothesis (enthusiasm decreases with age but experience increases, and there's an optimum cross-over point). This is the easiest viewpoint as you get older and look back at some of your earlier crazier ideas, but notice that that older crowd is very risk-averse. Douglas Adams had a great take on it:
  1. "everything that’s already in the world when you’re born is just normal;
  2. anything that gets invented between then and before you turn thirty is incredibly exciting and creative and with any luck you can make a career out of it;
  3. anything that gets invented after you’re thirty is against the natural order of things and the beginning of the end of civilisation as we know it until it’s been around for about ten years when it gradually turns out to be alright really.
  4. Apply this list to movies, rock music, word processors and mobile phones to work out how old you are."


I then moved on to Dean Simonton's observations, beautifully covered in Marc's article. My thinking was driven by books like "The Black Swan," "Fooled by Randomness," DeVany's analysis of Hollywood Economics and Home-Run Hitting, and a casual observation of how Evolution creates things (massive trial and error). Basically, the number of swings at bat, poems attempted, paintings painted, etc. determine the success rate. The more you try, the more you learn, the faster you iterate, the better you get, and the more chances that you have of being productive. Your outcome scales more with the number of bets than the...

If you can’t lighten up a little, then you won’t want to read this. If you can’t just pull up a chair, relax a little, and take that chip up there on your shoulder and set it aside for a while, then you might as well move along. If you already know everything, [...]

In Part I of Putting the Lesson into Practice we talked about how the Cold-Start problem affects social web applications that tend to focus on social value. In this part we talk about the problem of feature creep and why it happens. The way to overcome the Cold-Start Problem (which we talked about in Part [...]

As displays increase in size and prices drop, more and more users will end up with relatively large displays by default . Nobody buys 15 or 17 inch displays any more; soon, it won't make financial sense to buy a display smaller than 20 inches. Eventually, if this trend continues, everyone will have 30-inch displays on their desktops. This is clearly a good thing. You can never have enough display space. But there is one unintended consequence of large displays.

One of the advantages of small monitors, ironically, is that because they're small, they nudge users into a simpler, windowless method of working . Instead of wasting time sizing, moving, and z-ordering windows, users only need to deal with one maximized window at a time. They can flip between maximized applications in much the same way they change channels on the television. But once your display gets to 1600 x 1200 or beyond, this easy one-app-per-display model isn't feasible any more. Dan recently ran into this problem when he upgraded to a 30" LCD :

Users of 30-inch monitors face the terrible, terrible problem of how to effectively use all of that space. You don't often want to maximise a folder or document window on a screen this big; either you'll end up with a lot of white space and important program buttons separated by a vast expanse of nothing , or you'll get lines of text 300 or more characters long, which are difficult to read .

That's the large display paradox . Having all that space can make you less productive due to all the window manipulation excise you have to deal with to make effective use of it.

Personally, I'm a card-carrying member of the prestigious three monitor club , which means I'm one step ahead of Dan. At least until he doubles or triples down :

Al Gore using three 30 inch monitors

Although my displays are only 20 inches in size, I have three of them . Maximizing a window to a 20 inch, 1600 x 1200 display area is a reasonable thing to do most of the time. I also use UltraMon , which gives me the indispensible ability to drag maximized windows between monitors . I'm constantly grabbing maximized windows and "throwing" them from monitor to monitor, ala

Well this weekend we dropped the engine out of the red MR2, tore it down to the shortblock, changed out the headgasket, and put it back together. I had a restful sleep and the next day we took the 5SFE engine out of the white one and bolted the 3SGTE into it. I started it up, pressed the gas, and drove to the moon on the 10 billion horsepower I had. Then my penis got really big from working on cars and I had a lot of sex while drinking and smoking. If you haven't been following the Diary Section, the tag for the back story is Kuro5hin Chopper.

2007-08-08 03:58:38 GMT

'Here, I'll put my number in your cell pho -- wait, why is it already here?'


[[Category:Blog entries by date|07.08.07]]
[[Category:Year, 2007]]
[[Category:Agile software development]]
[[Category:Project management]]

==Blog: August 7, 2007 ==

I've noticed people lately yet again getting wrapped around the axle of "''incremental''" development versus "''iterative''" development. RUP and the OMG didn't help matters any by calling everything ''iterations'' and ''iterative development''. They're different, have to managed differently, have to be thought of differently. It happens that most project teams do both at the same time, usually without thinking about it. Then someone starts thinking about it, gets clever, and does one without the other. Bad things ensue.

=== Incremental development defined ===
From [[Using VW staging to clarify spiral development#Incremental_development_defined|"Using VW staging to clarify spiral development"]]:
: By "incremental development", I specifically mean a
:: '''staging and scheduling strategy''' in which the various parts of the system are developed at different times or rates, and integrated as they are completed.
: It neither implies, requires nor precludes iterative development or waterfall development - both of those are rework strategies. The alternative to incremental development is to develop the entire system with a "big bang" integration.

''Incremental'' development helps you improve your '''process.''' Each time around the process, you get to change and improve your work habits.

=== Iterative development defined ===
From [[Using VW staging to clarify spiral development#Iterative_development_defined|"Using VW staging to clarify spiral development"]]:
: By "iterative development", I specifically wish to mean a
:: '''rework scheduling strategy''' in which time is set aside to revise and improve parts of the system.
: It does not presuppose incremental development, but works very well with it. As shown in the figures, the difference is that an increment may actually ship, whereas an iteration is examined for modification.

''Iterative'' development helps you improve your '''product.''' Each time around the process you get to change and improve the product itself (and maybe some of your work habits)


These definitions were written back in 1992, when they were still separate terms and people wanted to know their meanings. Then, as above, RUP and the OMG people mushed the two together and we've been having trouble ever since.

Those definitions are still pretty good, 15 years later. Sit on them, hatch them, think about what it means to do them separately and together. Think about how your project strategies might vary as...

2007-08-08 00:54:27 GMT

It's been one of those days.

It started with me forgetting my laptop bag at home . Then I had to work with an attorney on some things. He's a nice guy, and does a good job, but you know, it's not what I'd really like to spend my day doing.

Then in the middle of the afternoon, I hung up the phone and checked my email. About 50 messages from Samba telling me that processes with various PIDs had crashed unexpectedly. Uh-oh. I think we still have some 80ish people using that.

About a minute later, a coworker says, "John, I've been bad." "Is that why I just got 50 emails from Samba?" "No. Well, yes. Well, maybe. I don't know."

It turned out he was working on a restore from tape that, out of necessity, grabbed more data than he needed. He meant to type rm -r ./var but typed rm -r /var instead. Oops. He hit Ctrl-C halfway through, so /var was still there enough to send email but not enough for Samba (or, apparently, NFS) to work.

As he dashed off to pull yesterday's tapes from offsite storage, I prepared the restore and made a plan. We hadn't installed any software since yesterday, so I restored var to a temporary location, took the server down into single-user mode, overwrote the /var that still existed, and rebooted the Xen instance in question. Everything back to normal. Except, that is, for the potentially dozens of users that will require assistance running SCANPST.EXE because their Outlook PST, being the fragile heap of garbage that it is, will have somehow been corrupted by this little incident.

So, what did we learn from this?

  • Deleting /var was probably the least annoying outage I've had to deal with yet. Certainly less nerve-wracking than the time I was working on a live, powered-up server and my wedding ring shorted out something on a circuit board. I didn't know if that thing would just reboot or if we'd be down for hours waiting for parts...

  • It was really nice knowing what was going on, rather than trying to find that bit out

  • One coworker commented, "if he had to delete part of an operating system, at least it wasn't Windows. We wouldn't have recovered in 15 minutes if it was." True.

  • Bacula is great.

  • Backups are great, even if you don't use Bacula to make them.

  • I dislike programs that take server load from 0.3 to 9.5 just telling you that there's something wrong with the server.

I work in an open-plan office. Normally I like to listen to some of my iPod's music, or NPR or something, at some point during the day. It helps me tune out distractions when I'm coding or concentrating on something. My iPod, and my nice Etymotic headphones, get transported to and from work each day in my laptop bag. Today I forgot the laptop bag at home.

What to do? I could just work without headphones. I'd be fine, but you know, I've got standards here. My job involves working with computers, so I ought to be able to come up with a workaround, right?

So lesse... what do I have? One binaural (mono sound, but speakers for each hear) telephone headset. One Polycom SIP phone, connected to our corporate Asterisk system. One workstation with sound capabilities. One installation of Asterisk on this workstation for testing purposes. And, a pre-existing path from the corporate system to the workstation system for testing Asterisk. (Very handy that, and used a lot when we were doing active Asterisk work.)

So in less then five minutes I had music going via my telephone headset. Lo-fi, and not noise-dampening like the Etymotics, but I enjoyed it for the simple fact that it was being played *over the phone* at no cost to anyone. My desk phone supports multiple "lines", so I still could place and receive calls just fine.

Should anyone care to look, they'd find a 5-hour call from me to myself deep in the Asterisk logs. My own workstation logs will show that I put myself on hold for 5 hours (since I used Asterik's music-on-hold feature to play my own selections).

IP telephony is fun. So is Asterisk.

The programmer, like the poet, works only slightly removed from pure thought-stuff. He builds castles in the air, from air, creating by exertion of the imagination. Few media of creation are so flexible, so easy to polish and rework, so readily capable of realizing grand conceptual structures. Yet the program construct, unlike the poet's words, is real in the sense that it moves and works, producing visible outputs separate from the construct itself. It prints results, draws pictures, produces sounds, moves arms. The magic of myth and legend has come true in our time. One types the correct incantation on a keyboard, and a display screen comes to life, showing things that never were nor could be. ... The computer resembles the magic of legend in this respect, too. If one character, one pause, of the incantation is not strictly in proper form, the magic doesn't work. Human beings are not accustomed to being perfect, an few areas of human activity demand it. Adjusting to the requirement for perfection is, I think, the most difficult part of learning to program.
-Frederick P. Brooks, "The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering, Anniversary Edition (2nd Edition)"

User-generated Content Add Comment

Imagine a 300-page history of the United States that spent the first 290 pages on events up to and including the Civil War, then zoomed through everything else in the last 10 pages. According to Doug Gale, who I met this week at EDUCAUSE, that’s more or less how the history of the Internet has [...]

SmartTechie (what a horrible name for a magazine !! ) has an article purportedly written by Roy Singham, CEO of Thoughtworks. Having worked at Thoughtworks and having met and interacted with Roy, I am very skeptical about the attributed authorship. The article has many examples of "Indian English" and is very tortured writing to boot. Roy is a very articulate speaker and writer and speaks perfect "American". So if you read the article and go "WTF?!!" do keep in mind that the writer is probably some Indian hack pretending to be Roy

Here is a sample " To over take other automobile companies and to reach at the helm, Toyota had devised a comprehensive action plan which included the Toyota Production System. " .

"reach at the helm"? WTF? You expect me to believe Roy writes or speaks like that?

I can only conclude that some half baked journalist essentially made up the article and attributed it to Roy.

Thoughtworks is an excellent company, with many world class writers in its ranks and this kind of ghostwriting goes against everything Thoughtworks stands for. And if the editors at the magazine must have someone pretending to be Roy, they magazine ought to get someone who understands how to write English well.

It amazes me that people whose profession is all about writing well don't know the rudiments of the language in which they write.

Hugh McGuire, the LibriVox dude, has started a new project,, whose tagline is: urging governments to make data about canada and canadians free and accessible to citizens. He wanted to know more about why I’ve been focusing lately on the issue of access to public data, so he emailed me some questions and has [...]

As senior technical officer for the Defense Intelligence Agency and chief of its requirements and research group, Lewis Shepherd has promoted and observed a remarkable transformation that’s occurring inside the U.S. intelligence community as analysts begin to embrace Web 2.0 practices. When we first met in March I jumped at the chance to quiz [...]

I’m introducing a new type of post here at Bokardo called “Interface Compare”. I’ll use it to compare interfaces from different services to highlight interesting things designers are doing (or not doing). The first installment is comparing the Invite screens on MySpace and Facebook. MySpace Invite Screen The interface for this is pretty straightforward. You can [...]

Microsoft won a reversal of the $1.52 Billion judgment for infringing Alcatel-Lucent MP3 patents. TechMeme has links to all the stories. The $1.5B judgment was the largest in patent history, and covered two patents around MP3 technology. Microsoft had previously paid to license the MP3 technology from the Fraunhofer Institute...

In the spirit of Jennifer Tidwell's excellent Designing Interfaces book , there are a few great catalogs of data visualization emerging online.

Start with the oft-cited Periodic Table of Visualization Methods .

Periodic Table of Visualization Methods

There's another excellent collection at Data Visualization: Modern Approaches .

visualization, html graph

visualization, munterbund

If you're looking for visualization with a less practical, more web-oriented bent, a colleague recently discovered the FWA: Favourite Web Awards site. That's where we found the Uniqlock "clock" , and the giant rickshaw pointer .

At any rate, if you're a student of Tufte like I am, you might find it helpful to review a sample of what visualizations and techniques are possible (or even advisable) before plowing ahead on your next "Rich Internet Application" .

[advertisement] makes it simple to create and share online photo albums. Upload your full resolution pictures via the web site or with the free Photo DropZone utility, and you're done. No fees. No storage limits. It's the fastest and easiest way to share photos and create albums .

Gaal Yahas wrote to refer me to an article about a pair of dice that never roll seven . It sounded cool, but but it was too late at night for me to read it, so I put it on the to-do list. But it reminded me of a really nice puzzle, which is to find a nontrivial relabeling of a pair of standard dice that gives the same probability of throwing any sum from 2 to 12. It's a happy (and hardly inevitable) fact that there is a solution.

To understand just what is being asked for here, first observe that a standard pair of dice throws a 2 exactly 1/36 of the time, a 3 exactly 2/36 of the time, and so forth:

2 1/36
3 2/36
4 3/36
5 4/36
6 5/36
7 6/36
8 5/36
9 4/36
10 3/36
11 2/36
12 1/36

The standard dice have faces numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. It should be clear that if one die had {0,1,2,3,4,5} instead, and the other had {2,3,4,5,6,7}, then the probabilities would be exactly the same. Similarly you could subtract 3.7 from every face of one die, giving it labels {-2.7, -1.7, -0.7, 0.3, 1.3, 2.3}, and if you added the 3.7 to every face of the other die, giving labels {4.7, 5.7, 6.7, 7.7, 8.7, 9.7}, you'd still have the same chance of getting any particular total. For example, there are still exactly 2 ways out of 36 possible rolls to get the total 3: you can roll -2.7 + 5.7, or you can roll -1.7 + 4.7. But the question is to find a nontrivial relabeling.

Like many combinatorial problems, this one is best solved with generating functions. Suppose we represent a die as a polynomial. If the polynomial is Σ a i x i , it represents a die that has a i chances to produce the value i . A standard die is x 6 + x 5 + x 4 + x 3 + x 2 + x , with one chance to produce each integer from 1 to 6. (We can deal with probabilities instead of "chances" by requiring that Σ a i = 1, but it comes to pretty much the same thing.)

The reason it's useful to adopt this representation is that rolling the dice together corresponds to multiplication of the polynomials. Rolling two dice together, we multiply ( x 6 + x 5 + x 4 + x 3 + x 2 + x ) by itself and get P ( x ) = x 12 + 2 x 11 ...

Los Angeles Times: A loosely formed coalition of left-leaning bloggers is trying to band together to form a labor union it hopes will help members receive health insurance, conduct collective bargaining or even set professional standards... "Bloggers are on our...

If you want to consider a cube analytically, you have an easy job. The vertices lie at the points:

And you can see at a glance whether two vertices share an edge (they are the same in two of their three components) or are opposite (they differ in all three components).

Last week I was reading the Wikipedia article about the computer game "Hunt the Wumpus" , which I played as a small child. For the Guitar Hero / WoW generation I should explain Wumpus briefly.

The object of "Wumpus" is to kill the Wumpus, which hides in a network of twenty caves arranged in a dodecahedron. Each cave is thus connected to three others. On your turn, you may move to an adjacent cave or shoot a crooked arrow. The arrow can pass through up to five connected caves, and if it enters the room where the Wumpus is, it kills him and you win. Two of the caves contain bottomless pits; to enter these is death. Two of the caves contain giant bats, which will drop you into another cave at random; if it contains a pit, too bad. If you are in a cave adjacent to a pit, you can feel a draft; if you are adjacent to bats, you can hear them. If you are adjacent to the Wumpus, you can smell him. If you enter the Wumpus's cave, he eats you. If you shoot an arrow that fails to kill him, he wakes up and moves to an adjacent cave; if he enters you cave, he eats you. You have five arrows.

I did not learn until much later that the caves are connected in a dodecahedron; indeed, at the time I probably didn't know what a dodecahedron was. The twenty caves were numbered, so that cave 1 was connected to 2, 5, and 8. This necessitated a map, because otherwise it was too hard to remember which room was connected to which.

Or did it? If the map had been a cube, the eight rooms could have been named 000, 001, 010, etc., and then it would have been trivial to remember: 011 is connected to 111, 001, and 010, obviously, and you can see it at a glance. It's even easy to compute all the paths between two vertices: the paths from 011 to 000 are 011–010–000 and 011–001–000; if you want to allow longer paths you can easily come up with 011–111–110–100–000 for example.

And similarly, the Wumpus source code contains a table that records which caves are connected to which, and consults this table in many places. If the caves had been arranged in a cube, no table would have been required. Or if one was wanted, it could have been generated algorithmically.

So I got to wondering last week if there was an analogous nomenclature for the vertices of a dodecahedron that would have obviated the Wumpus map and the table in the source code.

I came up with a very clever proof that there was none,...

Our deepest apologies for the lack of posts, but we've been busy: 1. We picked a logo 2. We picked a graphic designer and we're starting to work on the site design 3. We've launched! Admittedly, it's not much...

Here is the situation regarding the enterprise known as Your Black Muslim Bakery, located on San Pablo Avenue in Oakland, Calif. Its founder, a man named Yusuf Bey, was arrested in 2002 and charged with forcing an underage girl to have sex. Subsequent investigation suggested that he had a long history of rape and abuse of his followers and had by this means fathered numerous children out of wedlock. Bey died in September 2003 before his case could come to trial. His son Yusuf Bey IV has since been arrested twice, first on suspicion of leading a gang that had trashed two Oakland liquor stores and intimidated their owners, and second (and perhaps less Islamically) for running over a San Francisco bouncer with his car. Nedir Bey, one of Yusuf Bey's "spiritually adopted" sons, is also alleged to have beaten a possible business rival with a flashlight, while another member of the gang tortured the victim with a heated knife.

[ more ... ]

So I picked up a copy of PCLinuxOS 2007. Pop it in the drive, answer a few dialogs, and voila… we have a shiny new desktop. Time for some Emacs action! I open up a Konsole and type in ‘emacs’ and… I hear the whirring/clunking sound of a Millenium Falcon failing to make the jump [...]

While traveling to Snowmass Village, Colorado today for the EDUCAUSE Seminars in Academic Computing, I listened to a pair of podcasts: Steward Brand at PopTech and Esther Dyson at ITConversations. As often happens, I thought of questions I’d like to ask, and if I can bring them onto my own show I’ll do just [...]

Nivi: "The payoff of a human venture is, in general, inversely proportional to what it is expected to be." – The Black Swan, ...

2007-08-06 03:07:18 GMT

It's bad enough that all the families in your Sims are just you and Maggie recreated over and over.

As a result of my recent article on the snub disphenoid , Paul Keir wrote to me to ask about non-equiprobable dice. Specifically, he wanted a die that, because it was irregular, was twice as likely to land on one face as on any of the others.

That go me thinking about the problem in general. For some reason I've been trying to construct a die whose faces come up with probabilities 1/21, 2/21, 3/21, 4/21, 5/21, and 6/21 respectively.

Unless there is a clever insight I haven't had, I think this will be rather difficult to do explicitly. (Approximation methods will probably work fairly easily though, I think.) I started by trying to make a hexahedron with faces that had areas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and even this has so far evaded me. This will not be sufficient to solve the problem, because the probability that the hexahedron will land on face F is not proportional to the area of F , but rather to the solid angle subtended by F from the hexahedron's center of gravity.

Anyway, I got interested in the idea of making a hexahedron whose faces had areas 1..6. First I tried just taking a bunch of simple shapes (right triangles and the like) of the appropriate sizes and fitting them together geometrically; so far that hasn't worked. So then I thought maybe I could get what I wanted by taking a tetrahedron or a disphenoid or some such and truncating a couple of the corners.

As Polya says, if you can't solve the problem, you should try solving a simpler problem of the same sort, so I decided to see if it was possible to take a regular tetrahedron and chop off one vertex so that the resulting pentahedron had faces with areas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. The regular tetrahedron is quite tractable, geometrically, because you can put its vertices at (0,0,0), (0,1,1), (1,0,1), and (1,1,0), and then a plane that chops off the (0,0,0) vertex cuts the three apical edges at points (0, a , a ), ( b ,0, b ), and ( c , c ,0), for some 0 ≤ a , b , c ≤ 1. The chopped-off areas of the three faces are simply ab √3/4, bc √3/4, ca √3/4, and the un-chopped base has area √3/4, so if we want the three chopped faces to have areas of 2/5, 3/5 and 4/5 times √3/4, respectively, we must have ab = 3/5, bc = 2/5, and ca = 1/5, and we can solve for a , b , c . (We want the new top face to have area 1/5 · √3/4, but that will have to take care of itself, since it is also determined by a , b , and c .) Unfortunately, solving these equations gives b = √6/√5, which is geometrically impossible. We might fantasize that there might be some alternate solution, say with the three chopped faces having areas of 1/5, 2/5 and 4/5 times √3/4, and the top face being 3/5 · √3/4...

I notice that a number of people have my blog included in lists of "math blogs", which is fine with me, but I got a bit worried when I saw someone's web site that actually includes a lot of "math blog" articles, including mine, which is only ever about one-fourth math, the rest being given over to random other stuff. So the "math blog" section of this guy's web site is carrying my ill-informed articles about evolutionary biology and notes about the Frances the Badger books.

If you really do want just the math articles for some reason, you can subscribe to the feeds at or . I've been generating these sub-feed files since the blog began, and I know nobody uses them. But perhaps someone would like to.

Similarly, there are sub-feeds for other subsections of the blog, for example "physics". Most of these topic areas receive many fewer updates than does the "math" section:

64 math
16 lang
14 physics
14 oops
14 linogram
14 book
14 prog
10 bio
7 lang/etym
6 meta

Personally I feel that the eclecticism of the blog is one of its attractions, and I gather that a lot of other people do too, but perhaps not everyone agrees.

It's been a while since we've seen an investment bank melt down. Bear Stearns, I would assume, will be just fine, although you wouldn't know it from how they've been acting the last few days. Let's go to the conference...


[[Category:Blog entries by date|07.08.05]]
[[Category:Year, 2007]]
[[Category:Agile software development]]

====Blog: August 5, 2007 ====

I just started noticing an interesting trend --- more people are writing real "stories" to anchor their requirements (on agile projects).

This is a nice trend away from XP's "user stories" (misnamed because they generally contain no ''story'', just a feature or ability.)

The people writing these new types of stories don't care what XP calls or called it's <whatever-they-are>. They simply have decided to write stories describing a real person doing a real thing with the system, stories that have a beginning, a middle, an end, stories with steps in them, with concrete details.

Other people have done this in the past and given them names. HCI folks call them "concrete scenarios"; I had to call them "usage narratives" because XP had taken the more appropriate name "user story".

The new wave of people ignore all that and simply write stories.

Here's the type of thing:
: Fred the facilities manager creates an order using the system. The system notifies Rick the review manager, who reviews the order using the system and OKs it.

: Lee, the loading dock worker, puts it onto a truck, marking it accordingly in the system.

: When the truck gets to the receiving dock, Liz the loader at that location fills in needed paperwork, eventually also marking in the system that the item has arrived. . . .
You get the idea.

In some official lingo, this is a ''concrete scenario'' of a ''kite-level use case''. However, repeating myself, people writing these things often just call them "stories".

Try it - I think you'll like it.

(p.s. the Eclipse Jazz project also uses these stories - I'm trying to get one to post.)


[[People still trump process|<< previous blog entry]]
[[???|no next blog entry >>]]

2007-08-05 22:23:31 GMT

We turned on a reddit for politics today. Since I'm the one typically arguing against a reddit for politics, I feel as though I owe an explanation. But, since I'm the one writing the blog post, you aren't going to get one.

Ha. I'm just kidding.

The demand for a politics reddit has been great, and the political news has been bountiful, so here you go. We hope that a politics reddit will allow our politically inclined users to focus their submissions on a more targeted audience.

In other news...

The new version of reddit is inches away from getting online. We had hoped to get it online last week for you all to test and to play with, but things always seem to be more complicated in practice. We'll keep crunching and get things cruising as soon as we can.

Take it easy, redditors.

Nivi: "Reality, it turns out, usually delivers results somewhat worse than the 'worst case'." – Eliezer Yudkowsky,

I formerly had a great deal of respect, bordering on admiration, for Theo deRaadt's refusals to compromise his open source principles, even in the face of stiff opposition. Although he has occasionally gone over-the-top, recommended some frankly very dubious changes to OpenBSD, and is regularly arrogant (which is even more annoying because he's so often right!), he's always remained consistent in his devotion to the cause of GNU/Free Software.

2007-08-05 06:37:56 GMT

Going through some old code, I found this obfuscated python poem I wrote five years ago:

       cruel_python, what_have_i_done 
"awful code is so much fun"
if 'i am smart': 'it just might run'

"it's so much worse than 'hello world'"
"these next three lines look just like perl!"

bad="'enitlavo ruoy knird'=gsm;gsm labolgxgsm tnirp";
empty="";global eachone;evil=[];

'but a secret here is in your reach'
apples=oranges, "eachone=each"
def do(task="do what i ask"):
     global eachone; exec task
"and just in case you're not perplexed,"
worse,now = (bad.split('x'),"!")
for each in worse:
    exec apples[1]
    if each in worse:

worse = evil; "evil".split().reverse()
[each.reverse() for each in worse]
"and now we've reached the final verse"; 
map(do, map(empty.join, worse))

I originally posted this as a cryptogam on comp.lang.python, after my previous cryptogram was cracked after only half an hour.

Turns out, even with garbage code like this, python's syntax and whitespace made it trivial to crack the simple cipher.

If, like me, you are a fan of the implausibly best show on network television, Heroes, or if you just like fun writing, run don't walk to Amazon to buy Soon I Will Be Invincible, a novel by Austin Grossman....

Many people may not know this, but ErlyWeb has an app. It’s called BeerRiot (, and its creator is Brian Fink, whose been brewing it for a few months now (no pun intended). He blogs about it at (My favorite quote: “To those who are considering Erlang and ErlyWeb as a framework for their [...]

I finally found time to watch Simon Peyton-Jones’ recent OSCON 2007 tutorial, A Taste of Haskell (split in Part I and II, around 90 minutes each). From the many comments around and a quick look at the slides, I knew it was a basic intro for non-functional programmers and kept wondering if it would be [...]

A few months ago I and a few friends started meeting at the end of every month for an "iteration review" of how much progress we've made (or not) on our "life work" that month. The structured part of the meeting consists of each participant reporting what went right, what went wrong and what was learned during the preceding month and what the plans for the coming month are. Anyone can ask clarifying questions. This is followed by unstructured discussion over dinner (and drinks, for those who indulge in that particular vice). Apart from the obvious benefits of meeting up with friends regularly, the act of vocalizing what was learned has tremendous value.

The last meeting was focussed, for instance, on the difficulties of transitioning from the habits instilled from working in India's "Silicon Valley" to those needed for doing world class work, particularly in research/scientific software, the price one needs to pay and the metrics of progress. While that was a fascinating discussion, what struck me then was how lucky I am to know people who are unwilling to accept the status quo and exert themselves to become the best they can be.

This extends beyond the attendees of our end of month meetings. I just got back from lunch with another friend I haven't met in a while. I am amazed at how much she has learned in the intervening period and how many different areas of improvement she has targeted for the future. Indian society has the nasty habit of grinding down women who want to excel in any field, so that will be an interesting career to watch. If she ever starts a company, I will be the first to invest in it.

On reflection, I realize that I subconsciously rank people by (a) their potential to excel and (b)the ratio of actual achievement to potential achievement. I pay attention proportional to how high I think they score on these parameters and so I end up ignoring people who, in my subjective opinion, have low scores on both parameters.

I am not very sure that is the "right" way to judge people or decide who to befriend (I guess I am an unconscious "elitist") but it results in my knowing people who strive to excel. And given the caliber of some of my friends, I effectively end up knowing people who'll change the world.

A standard part of my development kit is Microsoft's Visual Studio . Here's what I have to install to get a current, complete version of Visual Studio 2005 on a new PC:

  1. Visual Studio 2005 Team Suite Edition
  2. Visual Studio Team Explorer (Team Foundation Client)
  3. Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1
  4. Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1 Update for Windows Vista
  5. SQL Server 2005 Express Service Pack 2
  6. Visual Studio 2005 Team Edition for Database Professionals
  7. Visual Studio 2005 Team Edition for Database Professionals Service Pack 1

Note that this is only a partial list; it doesn't include any of the other Visual Studio add-ons you might need to code against newer Microsoft technologies, such as ASP.NET AJAX , WF , or .NET 3.0 .

What's wrong with this picture?

I appreciate that some of these products were released out of order, which is partially why the install is so convoluted. But if one of the disadvantages of open-source software is "configuring the stack" , I'm having a hard time seeing how Microsoft's commercial stack is any easier to configure than the alternative open source stacks these days . Either the open source stuff has gotten a lot more streamlined and mature, or the Microsoft stuff is somehow devolving into complexity. I'm not sure which it is, exactly, but the argument that choosing a commercial development stack saves you time rings more and more hollow over time.

As the old adage goes, Linux is only free if your time is worthless *. But apparently your time can be worthless even if you've paid for the privilege.

* attributed to Jamie Zawinski .

[advertisement] allows you to send huge files (up to 1GB) to anyone without worrying about email attachment limits. Send via the Web site or download the DropZone utility for even more functionality. It’s fast, easy, and totally free! Transfer big files now .

Nivi: "Press is short for opression." – Wonder Showzen,

Nivi: "Confirmation bias: If I am selective about which arguments I inspect for errors, or even how hard I inspect for errors, then... every n ...

Nivi: "If Facebook evolves to create the “must be in” marketplace for viral distribution of consumer applications and content, it will become ...

2007-08-03 23:09:39 GMT


[[Category:Software development]]
[[Category:Articles by date|2007.08.03]]
[[Category:Year, 2007]]
[[Collaboration: the dance of contribution|
<< previous article]]
next article >>]]

'''Alistair Cockburn''', Humans and Technology, []

Humans and Technology Technical Report ''HaT TR 2007.02'', Aug. 05, 2007. © Alistair Cockburn

''Give your users two chances to review and revise each software feature before you consider the feature basically "done". Here's how to schedule, plan and track it.''

== The problem ==
Ever since writing [[Are iterations hazardous to your project?]] I have been bothered that the current agile practice doesn't seem to think it important that the users get to see what's being built and change or steer it. Iteration lengths are so short that the programmers barely have time to program up the basics before the end of the iteration – there's certainly not enough time for the users to show up and say, "No, actually, that's not what I had in mind" or "No, actually, that doesn't work very well for me."

I heard one XP "customer" ask others in the product management or "customer" role, "Is it just me, or do you also have to ''get it right'' the first time? On our project, if I request a change, they tell me that story will go back to the back of the queue or the project timeline will be delayed. As a result, I have to get it right the first time. ... Isn't this against the very spirit of agile development?"

This person is right on all counts – that does happen, and it is against the very spirit of agile development.

In [[Just-in-time_methodology_construction#Methodology_Families|Crystal Orange]], we had a policy rule, "there are two user viewings per release".

That is, within the normal cost of developing some feature or use case for the user community, they had two chances to see '''real''' code (not just a UI mockup) and change their minds about what they were requesting. Since that was for a fixed-price project, the project manager stipulated an additional rule – on the first viewing, they could change anything, but on the second viewing, they could only correct mistakes.

I took this as basic user rights – of course they should get a chance to see it and correct it before it would ever be considered "''done''"!

It seems as though I was fairly alone in believing this. Over the years, programmers have become so focused on "getting the user story ''done'' and geting velocity credit for it" that they started considering user changes as an unnecessary cost. ("We could get this software out much faster if only the users...

Wallop, Skinkers, and ZenZui are in the news. They are all startups based on technologies from Microsoft Research Labs. Microsoft has a relatively new program called IP Ventures designed to license Intellectual Property to external companies. There are over 20 technologies available for license, and more are being added every...

My class in the fall is called “User-generated”, and it looks, among other things, at the tension surrounding that phrase, and in particular its existence as an external and anxiety-ridden label, by traditional media companies, for the way that advertising can be put next to material not created by Trained Professionals™.

All right-thinking individuals (by which I basically mean Anil Dash and Heather Champ ) hate that phrase. Now my friend Kio Stark * has come up with what seems like a nice, and more anthropologically correct version: Indigenous Content (which is to say “Created by the natives for themselves.”)

* ObKio: Best. Tagset. Evar.

I play a bit of fingerstyle guitar as a hobby, and a while ago I found a nice arrangement of The Tennessee Waltz which I’ve been trying to learn. The other day I went to YouTube to check out some other arrangements. Wow. There’s a smoking version by Bonnie Raitt and Norah Jones, a classic [...]

2007-08-03 14:01:42 GMT

Scott examines strategies for dealing with constraints that business stakeholders may put on software development teams.

In Understanding Why Your VC Is Acting Crazy, Bill Burnham, a former Partner at Mobius Venture Capital and Softbank Capital Partners, describes why investors don’t always do the right thing for your business: “One thing that many entrepreneurs don’t fully appreciate is just how much the financial and organizational dynamics within a VC fund can affect [...]

The Microsoft Zune is an excellent example of breaking The Lesson as it puts social value above personal value. Because we don’t get an answer the question “What’s in it for me?”, the Zune will most likely continue to fail. Here is a snippet from the Zune site: Mama always said to share. Now you [...]

2007-08-03 11:26:44 GMT

On August 29th, I'm leaving for the 16-hour car drive to Carleton College in Northfield, Minnesota, US. It's a small liberal arts college, but it has reasonable departments in math and CS. I'm entering it as a Freshman this fall, and I'm really, really excited. I'm not sure whether to major in math, computer science or something else like economics or linguistics because I want to study everything. But I don't want to spend all of my time on the computer, so I'm banning myself from programming Factor and blogging during the month of September. I need to build a social life there, and this has the potential to ruin it. But don't assume that this blog is dead after the end of August; just come back October 1 expecting a nice posting on something practical, like XML (ugh), Unicode (2x ugh) or a little useful script I made.

Before I go, there are a few tasks that I need to accomplish. The most important one is implementing conjoining jamo behavior so that Korean will work properly in Unicode. (Korean will take a huge amount of room in memory, which I'll describe soon in another post.) Additionally, I have to finish Unicode collation and fix some problems with pull-elem , which will probably require huge changes in extra/xml/xml.factor . Those last two things might have to wait until October, but the first one is essential because there are people waiting for Unicode support, and strings of UTF-8 which Factor thinks are ISO 8859-1 won't cut it. I hope proper Unicode handling, including 8- and 32-bit strings, are made a part of Factor .90, or at the latest .91.

If I have any readers (or if there are any other Factorers) in the Northfield area, or just the Minnesota area (besides Doug), please contact me.

This is a fun example of using FlexMock

Andrew Sweeney Asks:

Andrew Sweeney emailed me with the following question:

I am currently working on a ruby project in which I think flexmock would be a good fit for unit testing. I have read the documentation and gone over the examples however fail to wrap my head around how to apply flexmock to my own app. I was hoping that you could give me some guidence and get me started or point me in the right direction.

You can find his original source code here .

I thought his problem was interesting enough to write it up as an example of using FlexMock. Andrew and his mentor, Bil Kleb gave permission for me to reproduce the code in my blog. The F3D Queue class is part of a Computational Fluid Dynamics project ( ) at NASA .

Quick Code Review

The F3D Queue class is small, so there’s not a lot of code we need to wade through. We see it uses a second class named AutoF3D, but the only clues we have to what AutoF3D might do are the four method calls on the “job” object in the run method.

It looks like the main interface to the queue object is the add_to_queue method. There is a thread started that pulls jobs (i.e. AutoF3D objects) from the queue and processes them in turn. There is some server delays built into the system. I presume that Computational Fluid Dynamics is, ummm, computationally complex and the delays are just there to make sure the workload does eat up all the CPU time on the server.

Starting Testing

When writing new code, I always like to approach it in a Test-First manner. Because I won’t write solution code without a test that forces me to write it, I have a high confidence that the code is will covered with tests.

Unfortunately, dealing with legacy code means that the code is already written and the test-first approach won’t work. That’s ok, I have a little trick that I use. Just comment out the bodies of all the methods in the class you are about to test. Then write the tests that force you to uncomment the code. Just uncomment only enought to get the tests to pass, don’t uncomment anything you don’t have to. You have enough tests when all the code has been uncommented. The technique is almost as good as doing real test-first.

The Commented Out Version

Here's an interesting thought question from Mike Stall: what's worse than crashing?

Mike provides the following list of crash scenarios, in order from best to worst:

  1. Application works as expected and never crashes.
  2. Application crashes due to rare bugs that nobody notices or cares about.
  3. Application crashes due to a commonly encountered bug.
  4. Application deadlocks and stops responding due to a common bug.
  5. Application crashes long after the original bug.
  6. Application causes data loss and/or corruption.

Mike points out that there's a natural tension between...

  • failing immediately when your program encounters a problem, eg "fail fast"
  • attempting to recover from the failure state and proceed normally

The philosophy behind "fail fast" is best explained in Jim Shore's article (pdf).

Some people recommend making your software robust by working around problems automatically. This results in the software "failing slowly." The program continues working right after an error but fails in strange ways later on. A system that fails fast does exactly the opposite: when a problem occurs, it fails immediately and visibly. Failing fast is a nonintuitive technique: "failing immediately and visibly" sounds like it would make your software more fragile, but it actually makes it more robust. Bugs are easier to find and fix, so fewer go into production.

Fail fast is reasonable advice-- if you're a developer. What could possibly be easier than calling everything to a screeching halt the minute you get a byte of data you don't like? Computers are spectacularly unforgiving, so it's only natural for developers to reflect that masochism directly back on users.

But from the user's perspective, failing fast isn't helpful. To them, it's just another meaningless error dialog preventing them from getting their work done. The best software never pesters users with meaningless, trivial errors-- it's more considerate than that . Unfortunately, attempting to help the user by fixing the error could make things worse by leading to subtle and catastrophic failures down the road. As you work your way down Mike's list, the pain grows exponentially. For both developers and users. Troubleshooting #5 is a brutal death march, and by the time you get to #6-- you've lost or corrupted user data-- you'll be lucky to have any users left to fix bugs for.

What's interesting to me is that...

2007-08-03 07:57:50 GMT

Bryan O'Sullivan noted over at the Real World Haskell blog that Haskell made quite the impact at OSCon. And I can attest to Simon Peyton-Jones having trouble leaving the building because of all the people that wanted to talk to him about Haskell. It was interesting to think about "why now" for Haskell's popularity. Bryan's post has links to the video of Simon's talks, which are great. (Sample quote: "Oh look, a whiteboard has appeared as if by magic! What joy!")

I followed Bryan's link to the Haskell/OSCon-related blog posts at Technorati. Here's an interesting one by chromatic, who gave some Perl talks at OSCon. Favorite quote:

I sat next to Nat Torkington at the tutorial. He kept rubbing his temples. At one point I leaned over and said, “The interesting thing about Haskell is that its functions only take one argument.” He turned green.

In all seriousness, well-factored Haskell code resembles well-factored Smalltalk code: if you have functions (or methods) longer than a handful of lines, you’re probably doing too much. Lower level languages such as C rarely give the opportunity for composition and abstraction that you can get out of functional languages. The presence of pure functions–functions which never change global state and which return the same output for the same input–is also immensely important.

It’s actually the combination of the two features which give these languages such power. When Haskell forces you to mark impure functions explicitly, it gives you tools to isolate behavior which can change global state in the smallest possible scopes, and prevents you from composing impure and pure code together accidentally. When Haskell lets you compose functions into larger functions, not only does it help you write code more concisely, but it provides well-defined units of behavior which work along well-defined and isolated boundaries.

So what is this business about Haskell functions taking only one argument? Let's look at a quick example. Say I wanted to write a function to multiply two numbers. I'd write:

mul a b = a * b

I could give the type of this function like this:

mul :: Int -> Int -> Int

You could read that as "mul takes two Ints and returns an Int". And you can think of it this way. But you could also write the type this way:

mul :: Int -> (Int -> Int)

It means the exact same thing and is valid to Haskell. To read it, you'd say "mul takes an Int and returns a function that takes an Int and returns an Int." And truly this is what Haskell functions that take multiple parameters are doing....

Nivi: "In a startup, no facts exist inside the building, only opinions." - Steven Blank, The four steps to the epiphany

We've decided to hold the RIA conference at a later date. Instead, you can now extend your Flex and AIR experience for an entire week.

As many of you know, Nicole Ellison and I are guest editing a special issue of JCMC . As a part of this issue, we are writing an introduction that will include a description of social network sites, a brief history of them, a literature review, a description of the works in this issue, and a discussion of future research. We have decided to put a draft of our history section up to solicit feedback from those of you who know this space well. It is a work-in-progress so please bear with us. But if you have suggestions, shout out.

history of social network sites (a work-in-progress)

In particular, we want to know: 1) Are we reporting anything inaccurately? 2) What are we missing?

ASP.NET 2.0's control adapters are a configurable component that lets you extend any control to customize its rendering engine

One will rise and one must fall. The phone rings. It's Mom. She wants to know if I'm still alive. This happens more often than you'd think. A bridge has collapsed. I wasn't on it (sorry, guys), but I may well have been. Hanging up with Mom, I do what every self-respecting blogger with delusions of legitimate journalistic credentials would do: put on my headphones, grab the camera, hop on the bike and go scoop the MSM.

2007-08-02 19:25:54 GMT

Is the rediscovery of the desktop just the latest swing of some tech-trend pendulum, or is there something more going on here?

Service-Component Architectures (SCA) provide a programming model for implementing Service-Oriented Architectures (SOA).

Desktop widgets are lightweight client apps used with RIA to take optimum advantage of what the client and server have to offer.

2007-08-02 19:25:53 GMT

Codice Software tackles Agile methodologies (SCRUM) and process improvement (CMMi) at the same time.

New York Times home page: The governor of Minnesota and officials from several other states have ordered all bridges to be inspected....

Thanks to some really great comments on yesterday’s item I’ve taken another pass through the spreadsheet I got from the police department1. It looks like Chris Anderson and David French were exactly right to suggest a “police station effect” — namely, that there’s more crime at or near the police station. Here’s a version of yesterday’s [...]

Software is such an abstract domain that it is rare for a photograph to say much. But during his recent trip to OSCON, Adam snapped a photo that actually says quite a bit . For those who are curious, "jdub" is the nom de guerre of Jeff Waugh , who should really know better ...

Thanks to a generous domain-name donation from OpenDomain , the new home of ECMAScript is ! The previous domains we created for it now redirect to the new domain.

John Dvorak, well known writer for PC magazine says Bubble 2.0 Coming Soon. John says we saw this before in 1999-2000 and the exact same thing will happen again. I don't think so. There are big differences between 1999 and 2007. Marshall Kirkpatrick does a nice job of dismantling Dvorak's...

last update: 1242, 10 Aug
The weather in Austin

Jon Udell
Bill Clementson
{ | one, step, back | }
Don Dodge on The...
The Scariest Fun
Learning Lisp
The Valve
ACM Queue Feature...
Venture Hacks
Coding Horror
The Changelog
Jon Aquino
One Man Hacking
The Universe of...
Slate Magazine
Twitter / Nivi
without an e
programming musings
Useless Factor
Bruce Eckel
The Observation Deck
The Little Calculist
Paul Graham
Startup or Bust
symmetry magazine
Joel on Software
The C++ Source
A Neighborhood of...
You're It!
Technical Revenue
minor emacs wizardry
Tom Moertel
Life With Alacrity
Too Much Code
Room 101
Michael Feathers'
Creating Passionate...
Adaptive Path Essays
Channel 9
The gallery for Nandu
The gallery for Mythili
Back of a Napkin
Growing a Language
The Mindset
Kill the Meeting
Python owns us
Adam Bosworth